September's Question of the Month - Muscle Mass

 

My husband and I are rowing the Atlantic in October. He is 6'5" and weighs just under 18 stone and I am 5'5" and weigh just under 11 stone. My question is, should the calories we consume per day take into account our differing amounts of muscle mass? If so, is there an easy way to calculate this difference?

Energy requirements (calories) will vary depending on a number of factors: age, bodyweight, gender, your resting energy expenditure or resting metabolic rate (REE or RMR), the thermic effect of feeding (or diet induced thermogenesis) and physical activity levels. Within this your RMR can vary as it is directly related to the amount of metabolically active tissue you possess ­ at rest, your heart, liver, kidneys, lungs and brain are more metabolically active than muscle tissue. So your husband, being a foot taller than you, will have larger metabolically active organs which in turn will require more energy than your own organs, even before beginning to exercise! Individuals with a greater muscle mass in comparison to body fat will have a higher RMR. Yet again women usually lose out ­ typically having 5-10% lower RMR compared with men, mainly due to our larger stores of hormone-related fat.


Working out precisely how many calories an individual needs is fraught with problems and is usually left to the scientific laboratories. If there is no weight gain or weight loss, i.e. energy balance, one can assume that energy intake equals energy expenditure. In doing this, estimates of dietary intake can be validated. One way is by direct measurement, called direct calorimetry, where subjects are put in a large, expensive room and the amount of heat produced (and therefore calories) under certain conditions can be measured; another way more commonly used in sport science laboratories is by indirect calorimetry. This is where a lightweight portable analysers can be used to look at how much oxygen is used up (and carbon dioxide produced) a good measure of how much energy is being used up can be calculated. Another, very expensive method, is to give someone some water, specially labelled (non-radioactive) to be measured when given off on the breath or as sweat or urine.

Organ

% of resting metabolic rate for 65kg man
Liver

21
Brain

19
Heart

7
Kidneys

10
Skeletel Muscle

19
Remainder

19
 

100

So is there an easy way to calculate your calorie requirements? No, not accurately. However you can estimate requirements using formula based on metabolic rate, predicted from weight (measured in kilograms), using data collated by Schofield et al (1985).

 18-29 years  
 male  Metabolic rate = 15.1 x wt + 692
 female  Metabolic rate = 14.8 x wt + 487
 30-59 years  
 male  Metabolic rate = 11.5 x wt + 873
 female  Metabolic rate = 8.3 x wt + 846

 

So for a 32 year old female weighing 70kg (11 stone), her estimated metabolic rate would be:

8.3 x 70kg + 846 = 1,427 kcal a day

A 32 year old male weighing 113kg (around 18 stone) would have an estimated requirement of:

11.5 x 113 + 873 = 2,173kcal a day

Simply by being 7 stone heavier, an additional 746kcal extra each day is needed to maintain vital organ functioning at rest. Once you and your husband start moving around, using skeletal muscle yet more energy is needed to fuel you, and again he will need more!

To cover a general sedentary lifestyle, dietitians and nutritionists will multiply the metabolic rate by a physical activity factor (PAL). This is usually a factor of 1.4. So, our example 11 stone woman would have a total estimated daily requirement of 1,427 x 1.4 = 1, 9998kcal a day i.e. around 2,000kcal a day; the example man would need 2,173 x 1.4 = 3,042kcal i.e. around 3,000kcal a day.

The estimated calorie cost of various activities (in relation to your bodyweight) can be found in a number of nutritional and sports science text. By using reference text, and knowing what you are doing each hour of any 24hour period, you can approximate your calorie requirements. (see also paper by Ainsworth et al, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol 25 no.1, 1992)




 

© j.boorman 2001